Why Is Reading Road Closed Again on 11 15 2018

Transcript: OMB Director Mick Mulvaney on "Face the Nation," Feb. eleven, 2018

As head of the Office of Management and Budget at the White Business firm, Mick Mulvaney was responsible for overseeing the government to shut downwardly Friday when Congress failed to attain a spending deal alee of a midnight borderline. But the shutdown was short-lived, with both chambers voting on a ii-year budget deal that calls for increases in defense and domestic spending to the tune of $400 billion.

Mulvaney, who is also the acting director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, joined us to discuss the budget deal, its effects on the deficit and this week's turmoil amongst the White House staff.

The post-obit is a transcript of the interview with Mulvaney that aired Sun, Feb. 11, 2018, on "Face the Nation."


MAJOR GARRETT: Joining usa now is White House Budget Director Mick Mulvaney. He was also the interim director of the Consumer Financial Protection Board. Mr. Manager, those issues are important, but first, it's a bad calendar week for the White House in terms of personnel. Why shouldn't women reasonably wonder if this White House doesn't have a lax attitude when it comes to the question of domestic corruption?

MICK MULVANEY: I don't think we have a lax attitude. I recall what you saw happened this week, Major, was completely reasonable and normal. The president--

MAJOR GARRETT: Reasonable and normal.

MICK MULVANEY: Allow me explain that. The president had someone working for him who came to him and said: "Look, I've been accused of this. I've been falsely accused of this. Please don't believe it it's non true." If your cameraman came to you and said that to you, you probably would give that person the benefit the doubt or at least you want to do that because you know that person and you trust that person. That'south what the president did up until the time that information technology became obvious when the photographs came out that the person was not being honest with the president. And that person after that happened, we dismissed that person immediately so that- that's an ordinary and very human reaction to the- to the set of circumstances. You don't want to throw people out on the street based merely upon the allegation. Only as presently as it became apparent usa that the allegations were true, Rob Porter had to go.

MAJOR GARRETT: In other words Rob Porter deceived the Principal of Staff of the president of the Usa.

MICK MULVANEY: I think that under the circumstances, he wasn't entirely forthcoming with him and I recollect the photographs took everybody past surprise.

MAJOR GARRETT: Was there a blind spot considering of the reputation Rob Porter had in the White Business firm?

MICK MULVANEY: No I retrieve the president and the chief of staff -- I am much more likely to believe people not based on their gender but based on their human relationship with them. If Kellyanne Conway had come to the president and said something nosotros'd be more inclined to believe that person than the person that we don't know. Once again I think that'southward very natural human reaction to the circumstances

MAJOR GARRETT: In this climate, do y'all remember the president missed an opportunity and may have insulted people by not at to the lowest degree recognizing the victims in this situation, Rob Porter's ex-wives and the wife of David Sorenson who are victims?

MICK MULVANEY: I remember what y'all saw the president go through this week, and I don't know if y'all all played the video of the speech that he gave of that comment that he made. He was extraordinarily saddened by this. He's been let downwardly --

MAJOR GARRETT: On behalf of Rob.

MICK MULVANEY: He'due south been allow downwards past somebody who he trusted somebody who he put in a place of authority and then wasn't told the truth. I think that's lamentable and the president. I think you saw that this week

MAJOR GARRETT: You've spoken very highly of Master Kelly, the chief of staff. Saying he's brought order and subject. Was this calendar week a calendar week that is consequent with the order and discipline?

MICK MULVANEY: Yeah and again I continue telling you and nosotros've had these conversations before that to spotter the media cover the West Fly then go to piece of work in that location is like dark and day. And to believe the media that there's complete disarray, there's a bunch of infighting. And it's simply non the case that the West Wing continues to part. It functions well. I hear that I'm being considered, in the media at least, for replacing the main of staff or you call up that mayhap someone would have mentioned it to me. No 1's talked to me at all. Not a single time.

MAJOR GARRETT: How badly you lot don't want that chore?

MICK MULVANEY: I don't desire that task. I honey the job, jobs that I have now. And more importantly, I recall the master of staff is doing a actually good chore. And most importantly, I think the president thinks he's doing a dandy job, besides.

MAJOR GARRETT: Concluding calendar week in the midst of all this John Kelly served the president well.

MICK MULVANEY: I believe so under the circumstances of having someone who is close to y'all--

MAJOR GARRETT: Even with that statement that says he'south a man of truthful integrity?

MICK MULVANEY: You lot're going to desire to believe and trust the people that are close to you and that yous know. Y'all see, I think the problem here was with Mr. Porter, not with the chief of staff.

MAJOR GARRETT: All right. Permit'south go to the upkeep. Why is spending this money at present and having deficits projected at more than a trillion dollars in a growing non-recessionary economy that is already jittered Wall Street for a full week a good idea?

MICK MULVANEY: It'south a very dangerous thought, but it's the earth nosotros alive in. Here's what happens. Nosotros want money to defend the nation. We believe General Mattis has fabricated a example, I recollect to both Democrats and Republicans and to the public alike, that nosotros need more money to defend the nation against things like the threats from the North Koreans. We were hoping that we could sit down with the Democrats and figure out a style to get additional funds to the military to respond to these threats. Publicly the Democrats said they wanted to assistance fund the Defense Department. Privately, though, what they said was they would not give us a unmarried additional dollar for defense force unless nosotros gave them dollar for social programs.

MAJOR GARRETT: You knew they were going to say that.

MICK MULVANEY: Well, publicly they were not saying that. Publicly they were saying they wanted to defend the nation. They'll say that Democrats care as much about defense every bit Republicans do, but when the rubber meets the route they don't. They held the Defence force Department hostage, and nosotros had to pay that ransom.

MAJOR GARRETT: Congressman Mick Mulvaney, would have voted for this?

MICK MULVANEY: Oh, probably not. But keep in mind I'm non Congressman Mick Mulvaney anymore. I'm much closer to Mr. Meadows who you're going to have on the bear witness a little bit when I was a member of Congress. My job as the managing director of the Function of Management Budget is to try to get the president'south calendar passed. And right at present the peak priority for this president was getting the Defense force Department the money necessary to defend the nation.

MAJOR GARRETT: Let me ask you about your other task, interim director Consumer Financial Protection Board. It has been declared that you have stopped that agency's investigation to Equifax. Have yous?

MICK MULVANEY: I accept to give you lot a legal answer to that. If you ask somebody at the FBI nigh an ongoing investigation, you'll hear the same you heard from me, which is that I cannot comment on whether or whether or not there is an investigation.

MAJOR GARRETT: Thirty senators believe you take and have written to yous to that event.

MICK MULVANEY: I would encourage those senators to go look at the public 10Q filing that Equifax made last quarter so looked to the public 10Q filing that they will be making at the end of this quarter. That'due south all I can say about that matter.

MAJOR GARRETT: Where does Equifax and that information breach that affected 140 million Americans fall in your list of priorities for this agency you are now running?

MICK MULVANEY: The bureau's priorities remain the same. The bureau's priorities remain the same. We will protect consumers. There is no question about that. The priorities accept non inverse since I took over.

MAJOR GARRETT: When y'all say protect consumers tin can you define that? Because there are those who wait at your attitude and what you've done in that location with payday lenders and perhaps Equifax equally taking a complete footstep back.

MICK MULVANEY: What we've done over there John.

MAJOR GARRETT: Major.

MICK MULVANEY: Major, alibi me. Goodness gracious.

MAJOR GARRETT: He used to be here.

MICK MULVANEY: He used to be here. What we've done here is we've tried to figure out a style to manage this bureau. This bureau is unlike whatever other federal bureaucracy. It's run past one person. Right at present me. It has about unlimited admission to funds. It has no accountability to Congress. It is perhaps the most unaccountable bureau or bureau there is. We want to run that identify with a good deal of humility and prudence. We're non being aggressive, we're not pushing the envelope. We're taking a different attitude towards the job. Merely the priorities have not changed.

MAJOR GARRETT: Again, how would you lot define consumer protection under your leadership? What does that mean? What will people be protected from that they should be afraid of?

MICK MULVANEY: They should exist protected from fraud.

MAJOR GARRETT: Payday lenders?

MICK MULVANEY: Unfairness in merchandise practice. Things that are illegal. That's what we do. We enforce the law. We exercise non make the police force. And I call back that'due south an important stardom between my leadership and the previous leadership of the bureau. We will not be making law. We will not be making stuff upward as nosotros go. We will be enforcing the police force on the books.

MAJOR GARRETT: By implication are you maxim that'south what the previous managing director did?

MICK MULVANEY: Information technology's not implication. I'm saying information technology directly out.

MAJOR GARRETT: Mr. Director. Always a pleasure.

MICK MULVANEY: Thank you.

MAJOR GARRETT: Thank you for joining us on Face up the Nation.

figueroauscoulk.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/transcript-omb-director-mick-mulvaney-on-face-the-nation-feb-11-2018/

0 Response to "Why Is Reading Road Closed Again on 11 15 2018"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel